Short introduction on Malaysia’s emissions
Although CO2 is the driving force behind the temperature changes, other gases such as methane (CH4) also contribute their share to global warming, for example through the exploitation of gas fields, and emissions by livestock. While methane is emitted much less than CO2 on a global scale, it is a much stronger greenhouse gas (GHG). Scientists estimated the relative strength of the important Kyoto greenhouse gases so that we can convert all emissions to an equivalent of CO2 emissions. For example, the emission of one ton of methane has approximately the warming effect of 25 tons of CO2. The factor of 25 reflects the climate forcing on a 100-year time horizon, following the Global Warming Potential presented in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4).
With greenhouse gas emissions of approximately the equivalent of 373.5 mega tonnes of CO2 (Mt CO2eq), Malaysia contributed 0.78% to the global greenhouse gas emissions of 2017 (rank 24 - incl. EU27 on rank 3). All emissions estimates exclude emissions and absorption from land, which result from activities such as cutting down or planting of forests (Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry: LULUCF). Emissions from bunker fuels (international aviation and shipping) were also excluded, as they are not accounted for in national totals.
For 2030, Malaysia’s global contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is projected to decrease to approximately 0.70% (394.0 mega tonnes of CO2 equivalent / rank 30 - incl. EU27 on rank 4). The emissions projections for Malaysia were derived by downscaling the Shared Socio-Economic Pathways’ (SSPs) “Middle-of-the-Road” baseline marker scenario SSP2. These pathways describe certain narratives of socio-economic developments and were, i.a., used to derive greenhouse gas emissions scenarios that correspond to these developments. SSP2 is a narrative with little shifts in socio-economic patterns compared to historical ones, and is connected to medium socio-economic challenges for both climate mitigation and adaptation. While different models were used for each storyline, per SSP (SSPs1-5) one model was chosen as representative “marker scenario”. As the emissions projections are not readily available on country-level, but national estimates are important, the pathways were downscaled in the aftermath. In 2017, Malaysia represented 0.41% of the global population. Its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2017 were 0.72% of the global GDP.
Looking at the highest contributing emissions sectors and gases separately, we find that in 2017 the highest contributing emissions sectors were Energy and Waste (74.5% and 13.0%). Amongst the greenhouse gases that are considered in the Kyoto Protocol, the strongest contributor with 69.7% was CO2. This was followed by CH4 emissions, with a significantly lower share of 25.3%. When not considering the sectors and gases independently, but the sector-gas combinations instead, Energy CO2 and Waste CH4 (62.9% and 12.8%) represented the largest emissions in 2017.
Greenhouse gas mitigation and Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC)
In 2015, the majority of countries agreed to the Paris Agreement (PA), with the goal of “Holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change” (Article 2.1.a). Countries stated their pledges and targets towards achieving the PA’s goals in their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). With Article 4.4 of the Paris Agreement, Parties decided that “Developed country Parties should continue taking the lead by undertaking economy-wide absolute emission reduction targets. Developing country Parties should continue enhancing their mitigation efforts, and are encouraged to move over time towards economy-wide emission reduction or limitation targets in the light of different national circumstances.”
Following its NDC, “Malaysia intends to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity of GDP by 45% by 2030 relative to the emissions intensity of GDP in 2005. This consist of 35% on an unconditional basis and a further 10% is condition upon receipt of climate finance, technology transfer and capacity building from developed countries.” (NDC, p. 1). The conditional target is therefore a 45% reduction of Malaysia’s emissions intensity per unit of GDP by 2030, compared to 2005 levels.
Malaysia provides numerical data in its NDC, including the “Emissions in the base year: 288,663 Gg CO2eq” SAR, and this value “includes emissions from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) which have been estimated at 25,667Gg CO2eq [SAR] respectively” (NDC, p. 1, GWP: p. 2). Additionally, the GDP in the base year, and emissions intensity per unit of GDP for the base year are provided (NDC, p. 1). However, as the projected 2030 GDP or the expected GDP growth from the base to the target year are missing, this information is not sufficient to calculate the target in absolute emissions, hence, target estimates rely on “external” (non-NDC) data. The availability of national estimates of emissions mitigation targets and pathways in line with countries’ NDCs is of great importance when, e.g., aggregating to global emissions to then derive, i.a., the resulting end-of-century warming levels. The target is stated to be “economy-wide” (NDC, p. 1), and all main IPCC sectors are explicitly listed as covered (Energy, IPPU, Agriculture, LULUCF, and Waste; NDC, p. 1). As for the covered Kyoto GHGs, CO2, CH4, and N2O are addressed, while the F-gases are not mentioned (NDC, p. 1) and therefore assumed not to be included in this contribution. Based on PRIMAP-hist v2.1 HISTCR (exclLU, in AR4), the basket of F-gases only represented approx. 0.6% of 2017’ national Kyoto GHG emissions.
Additional information on LULUCF is presented, mentioning that “The inclusion of non-forest land (cropland, grassland, wetlands and settlement) will be determined later.”(NDC, p. 2), and legacy issues are states concerning LULUCF, as “Malaysia has a long forest management history. However, there are some areas of forest that have been degraded due to past management effects. Restoration and rehabilitation of these forests incurs high cost and nurturing. Furthermore, the advent of climate change has also highlighted another legacy in forest management, that is, the drained peatlands. In the 1960s and 70s, peatlands were considered a wasteland and draining was considered an effective rehabilitation to improve the productivity. Some of these drained peatlands are now unmanaged and are susceptible to wildfires during the dry seasons. It is also expensive to”re-wet” these areas.” (NDC, p. 4).
The NDC-assessment is based on Malaysia’s NDC submitted to the UNFCCC in November 2016. Relying on “external” non-NDC data (SSP2) and the assessed national share of targeted emissions, for Malaysia we quantify the 2030 unconditional target as 680.1 Mt CO2eq AR4 (relative emissions intensity reduction: -35%, inclLU), and estimate the 2030 conditional target as 576.4 Mt CO2eq AR4 (-45%, inclLU).
The Figure below provides additional information, regarding both the baseline emissions used in our assessment and the quantified mitigated pathways for Malaysia.
Baseline emissions and mitigated emissions pathways based on the country’s Nationally Determined Contribution. In terms of national emissions, we look at the SSP2 baseline marker scenario, and the emissions of all IPCC sectors. Contributions from LULUCF are excluded (exclLU), and the emissions are based on GWPs from AR4. The left panel (a) shows the baseline emissions, indicating the contributions of the Kyoto Greenhouse Gases CO2, CH4, N2O, and the basket of F-gases to the national emissions. If we could extract baseline data exclLU from the NDC, you can see their values as black squares (converted from GWP SAR to AR4 if needed). In the right panel (b), the quantified mitigated emissions pathways are shown, based on information from the country’s NDC and also on non-NDC emissions baselines, per target conditionality and range (marked un-/conditional best/worst). Even though not all countries have targets with different conditionalities or ranges, we need assumptions for all four cases to build one global pathway per conditionality plus range combination and to derive corresponding temperature estimates. Therefore, we indicate these four pathways here. Per combination, we performed several quantifications with differing assumptions and show the median and the minimal and maximal pathways here. Additionally, if we could quantify the targets based on data extracted purely from the NDC - or if the targets were directly given in absolute emissions, these targets are shown as squares (in the GWP originally given in the NDC).
Data sources and further information
- Historical emissions: PRIMAP-hist v2.1 (Guetschow et al., 2016, 2019).
- Historical socio-economic data: PRIMAP-hist Socio-Eco v2.1 (Guetschow et al., 2019).
- Projected emissions and socio-economic data: downscaled SSPs (Guetschow et al., 2020, 2020).
- NDC quantifications: NDCmitiQ (Guenther et al., 2020, 2021).
- GDP is given in purchasing power parity (PPP).
- Main emissions sectors (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC): Energy, Industrial Processes and Product Use (IPPU), Agriculture and LULUCF (Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry), also named AFOLU (Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use), and Waste.
- Kyoto GHG: basket of several GHGs, namely carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), and since the second Kyoto Protocol period (2013-20) additionally nitrogen fluoride (NF3).
- Global Warming Potentials (GWPs): GHGs have very different warming potentials. To make them comparable and for aggregation purposes, GWPs are used (how much energy will 1 ton of a certain gas absorb over a defined period of time, relative to the same mass of CO2?).
1 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), 14473 Potsdam, Germany